Grand Isle County, VT — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

29.8
Risk Grade
Excellent
NW VT; Lake Champlain Islands; island agricultural; active solar in agricultural areas; §248 CPG required; scenic island identity
Assessment Snapshot
Population
8,348
State Rank
#1
Compliance
45%
Trajectory
42

Moratorium Status

✓ No Active Moratorium
No Moratorium

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
State §248 CPG required (preempts local zoning). No county-level setbacks codified.
Zoning Mechanism
Vermont PUC §248 Certificate of Public Good (CPG) required; no separate county permit.
Acreage Caps
None codified.
Density Caps
None codified.
Spacing Rules
None codified.
Size Restrictions
None codified.

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Generally receptive — agricultural island; §248 pathway; scenic identity minor friction
Basis for Assessment
NW VT; Lake Champlain Islands; island agricultural; active solar in agricultural areas; §248 CPG required; scenic island identity
Political Risk Factors
Improving
Board Members
No county-level government — VT counties are judicial/administrative districts only. Elected county officials limited to State's Attorneys, Sheriffs, and Judges. Solar siting handled by VT PUC §248 (state-level preemption for all utility-scale projects).

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
ISO-NE / Vermont (VT) zone
Utilities
Green Mountain Power, Green Mountain Power
State Permitting Process
Vermont Public Utility Commission (PUC) issues Certificate of Public Good (CPG) under 30 VSA §248 for all utility-scale energy projects — Vermont has the lowest preemption threshold in the nation (effectively preempts local zoning for virtually all commercial solar). Section 248 Certificate of Public Good: required for any solar facility of sufficient scale. PUC must consider impacts on aesthetics, orderly development, wildlife, primary agricultural soils, and surrounding municipalities. 'Shocking or offensive' aesthetics standard applied by PUC. Act 174 (2016): municipalities/regions that adopt enhanced energy plans receive 'substantial deference' in §248 proceedings — key tool for local influence without blocking. Local governments cannot require separate approvals once CPG is issued, but can participate as formal parties in §248 proceedings. Vermont Agency of Agriculture reviews projects ≥50 kW on agricultural soils; must appear at hearings for projects >500 kW. ISO-NE interconnection required statewide.
State Incentives
Vermont RPS: 75% renewable by 2032; 90% by 2050 (Renewable Energy Standard). Group Net Metering: allows multiple accounts to share credits from a solar array. VT CEDF (Clean Energy Development Fund): grants and loans for solar projects via VDPSMR. Sustainably Priced Energy Enterprise Development (SPEED): qualifying facility program. VT Green Mountain Power (GMP) solar programs: shared solar, community resilience hubs. Act 174 (2016): municipal/regional energy plans can affect siting approvals. Utility: Green Mountain Power serves most of VT; Vermont Electric Cooperative (VEC) serves Northeast Kingdom; Washington Electric Coop serves Orange/Washington county area.

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
Solar development in Grand Isle County (Lake Champlain islands). Green Mountain Power serves Grand Isle County. VT PUC §248 required. Small county (5 towns); some solar on island. No major named utility-scale projects confirmed in public sources.
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
No confirmed VT PUC Certificate of Public Good (CPG) denial on record for Grand Isle County as of Mar 2026. Note: VT PUC denied 500 kW Manchester project solely on aesthetics (2021) — aesthetic criterion is real barrier statewide.

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker