Emery County, UT — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

74
Risk Grade
Fail
Coal-country economic identity; declining population; commissioners have publicly stated opposition to utility-scale solar; informal blockade posture
Assessment Snapshot
Population
9916
State Rank
#19
Compliance
65%
Trajectory
70

Moratorium Status

✓ No Active Moratorium
No specific moratorium information available.

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
Not defined for solar; general industrial setbacks at commission discretion
Zoning Mechanism
CUP required; historically denied or discouraged
Acreage Caps
No formal cap; practical resistance from commission
Density Caps
None formal
Spacing Rules
Not specified
Size Restrictions
Not formally specified; discretionary resistance

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Strongly resistant — coal plant community; population declining as coal industry contracts
Basis for Assessment
Hunter Power Plant and Huntington Power Plant are major local employers; county identity tied to coal; population loss driving defensive posture
Political Risk Factors
Deteriorating
Board Members
Leland Stilson | R | 2026; Lynn Sitterud | R | 2026; Kendall Thomas | R | 2028

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
Rocky Mountain Power (PacifiCorp) — East Control Area; Hunter Plant interconnection
Utilities
Rocky Mountain Power (PacifiCorp)
State Permitting Process
ESSA for >50 MW; hostile local permitting climate
State Incentives
Utah Renewable Energy Systems Tax Credit; net metering (RMP East)

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
None utility-scale solar
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
PacifiCorp Hunter coal plant repower discussions ongoing; solar alternatives opposed locally

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker