Davis County, UT — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

28.2
Risk Grade
Excellent
High saturation risk (rooftop market maturing); low compliance burden; favorable trajectory
Assessment Snapshot
Population
362679
State Rank
#1
Compliance
20%
Trajectory
20

Moratorium Status

✓ No Active Moratorium
No specific moratorium information available.

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
Not required for rooftop; 50 ft for ground-mount residential
Zoning Mechanism
Administrative permit for residential/commercial rooftop; CUP for ground-mount >1 acre
Acreage Caps
No cap; limited by dense suburban land availability
Size Restrictions
Available land is primary constraint in dense suburban environment

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Favorable — growing suburban community with high solar adoption
Basis for Assessment
High household income; growing environmental awareness; strong net metering use; county installed solar on facilities
Political Risk Factors
Improving
Board Members
Bob Stevenson | R | 2026; P.H. Stevenson | R | 2026; Lorene Kamalu | R | 2028

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
Rocky Mountain Power (PacifiCorp) — West Control Area
Utilities
Rocky Mountain Power (PacifiCorp), None (some municipal utilities in cities)
State Permitting Process
ESSA for >50 MW (not applicable at county scale given urban density)
State Incentives
Utah Renewable Energy Systems Tax Credit; net metering (25 kW cap per residential)

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
Multiple commercial rooftop; Davis County facilities solar (2021–2024)

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker