SolarRisk Tracker / Explore / TX / Pecos

Pecos County, TX — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

18.5
Risk Grade
Excellent
Grade A: Major West Texas utility-scale solar production county; no ordinance, no moratorium; 4+ projects totaling 900+ MW operational or in development; no governance barriers; pro-energy Commissioners Court; exceptional solar resource.
Assessment Snapshot
Population
15823
State Rank
#3
Compliance
20%
Trajectory
20

Moratorium Status

✓ No Active Moratorium
No specific moratorium information available.

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
None codified.
Zoning Mechanism
No county solar ordinance — by-right in unincorporated areas. ERCOT interconnection; AEP WTU/Oncor 345 kV transmission backbone serves region.
Acreage Caps
None.
Density Caps
None.
Spacing Rules
None.
Size Restrictions
None.

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Pro-solar — major utility-scale solar production hub; multiple GW-scale projects operational and in ERCOT interconnection queue; landowners broadly support lease income; Commissioners Court consistently supportive of energy development of all types.
Basis for Assessment
Fort Stockton county seat; one of Texas's largest counties (~4,764 sq mi, 3M+ acres); flat Chihuahuan Desert terrain with exceptional solar irradiance (GHI >5.5 kWh/m²/day); AEP West Texas Utilities (WTU) / Oncor 345 kV transmission backbone; Permian Basin energy development culture; water infrastructure (Fort Stockton historic springs area); major ERCOT interconnection hub.
Political Risk Factors
Improving
Board Members
See pecoscountytx.gov/commissioners for current commissioners court members

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
ERCOT / AEP West Texas Utilities (WTU) / Oncor 345 kV transmission zone
Utilities
AEP Texas Central / West Texas Utilities (WTU), Fort Stockton Electric (municipal utility, city limits only)
State Permitting Process
No state siting board for solar in Texas. PUCT regulates utilities; ERCOT manages interconnection for ERCOT service territory (most of state); SPP governs Panhandle/northwest TX. County Commissioners Court governs unincorporated areas under Texas Local Government Code. Many rural TX counties have NO zoning authority — solar is essentially by-right. HB 2527 (2023) requires counties with ordinances to provide a 'reasonable' permitting framework. ERCOT interconnection queue severely congested — grid study delays of 2-4+ years common.
State Incentives
Texas has no state RPS mandate. Key incentives: Federal ITC (30% base + bonus adders for energy communities/domestic content). Property tax abatement via Chapter 312/313 successor frameworks (county-level negotiation required). ERCOT wholesale market provides strong merchant revenue stack. No state income tax benefits developer HQ decisions. USDA REAP available for rural projects.

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
Alamo 6 Solar Farm (110 MW, online 2016, ~1,000 acres); OnPeak Power Solar (306 MWac, Fort Stockton area, COD Dec 2024, 180 MW contracted to CPS Energy); Whitethorn Solar (270 MWac, ERCOT 345 kV interconnect, in development); Larrea Solar (225 MWac, ERCOT 345 kV interconnect, in development).
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
None documented.

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker

Last verified: April 2026 (web research) | SolarRisk Tracker | Data sources: Government records, utility filings, public meeting minutes