Hood County, TX — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

68.8
Risk Grade
Poor
Grade C: 2024 restrictive solar ordinance with setbacks — no active moratorium but regulatory environment significantly constrains utility-scale development. Worsening trajectory as ordinance was recently adopted and community opposition remains active. [TBV — monitor for further ordinance amendments or moratorium proposals].
Assessment Snapshot
Population
69153
State Rank
#43
Compliance
70%
Trajectory
80

Moratorium Status

✓ No Active Moratorium
No specific moratorium information available.

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
2024 ordinance establishes setback requirements from roads, property lines, and residences [TBV — verify exact setback distances (reported as significant) via Hood County ordinance text at co.hood.tx.us].
Zoning Mechanism
Solar Energy Ordinance (2024) — utility-scale solar requires compliance with setback requirements and county standards; permit process through Hood County Commissioner Court [TBV — verify whether SUP/CUP required or administrative review].
Acreage Caps
[TBV — verify whether acreage caps imposed by 2024 ordinance]
Density Caps
[TBV — verify via ordinance text]
Spacing Rules
[TBV — verify via ordinance text]
Size Restrictions
[TBV — verify via ordinance text]

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Mixed-Hostile — organized community opposition to utility-scale solar in Granbury/Hood County area; 2024 ordinance reflects commissioner response to constituent pressure; Lake Granbury/scenic character concerns cited by opponents.
Basis for Assessment
Granbury county seat; Oncor TDU territory; Fort Worth exurb experiencing rapid residential growth; conservative commissioner court adopted restrictive ordinance in 2024 following community opposition; Lake Granbury recreational character amplifies aesthetic/land-use concerns.
Political Risk Factors
Worsening
Board Members
County Judge Ron Massingill, Commissioner Pct. 1 Kevin Andrews, Commissioner Pct. 2 Dave Eagle, Commissioner Pct. 3 Nannette Samuelson, Commissioner Pct. 4 Jack Wilson

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
ERCOT
Utilities
Oncor Electric Delivery (TDU)
State Permitting Process
No state siting board for solar in Texas. PUCT regulates utilities; ERCOT manages interconnection for ERCOT service territory (most of state); SPP governs Panhandle/northwest TX. County Commissioners Court governs unincorporated areas under Texas Local Government Code. Many rural TX counties have NO zoning authority — solar is essentially by-right without county approval requirement. HB 2527 (2023) requires counties with solar ordinances to provide a 'reasonable' permitting framework. No statewide preemption prevents county restrictions. ERCOT interconnection queue is severely congested — grid study delays of 2-4+ years common.
State Incentives
Texas has no state RPS mandate. Key incentives: Federal ITC (30% base + bonus adders for energy communities/domestic content). Property tax abatement via Chapter 312/313 successor frameworks (county-level negotiation required). ERCOT wholesale market provides strong merchant revenue stack. No state income tax benefits developer HQ decisions. USDA REAP available for rural projects.

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
No confirmed utility-scale solar projects approved as of Apr 2026 [TBV — verify Hood County records].
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
Community opposition led to ordinance adoption in 2024; no specific denied project names documented [TBV — verify Hood County Commissioner Court minutes for project-specific actions].

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker