SolarRisk Tracker / Explore / TX / Franklin

Franklin County, TX — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

58
Risk Grade
Fair
Grade C: Commissioners attempted moratorium (Nov 2022) — overruled by AG. No current active moratorium, but board demonstrated willingness to restrict solar. AG ruling limits future action but community/board opposition sentiment persists. Grade C reflects hostile board disposition and prior attempted restriction, despite AG-mandated by-right pathway.
Assessment Snapshot
Population
10359
State Rank
#40
Compliance
45%
Trajectory
50

Moratorium Status

✓ No Active Moratorium
Expired / Rescinded (attempted Nov 2022)

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
None codified.
Zoning Mechanism
No ordinance — by-right in unincorporated areas. AG ruling (2023) limits county moratorium authority.
Acreage Caps
None.
Density Caps
None.
Spacing Rules
None.
Size Restrictions
None.

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Mixed/opposed — initial community resistance; moratorium attempted but AG ruling preempted; some community opposition continues.
Basis for Assessment
Mount Vernon county seat; R-majority board; moratorium attempt (Nov 2022) signals hostile board disposition; AG 2023 ruling overrides local authority; SPP grid territory; small county (284 sq mi); growing population (+0.65–1.6%/yr).
Political Risk Factors
Stable
Board Members
See franklincountytx.gov/commissioners for current commissioners court members

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
SPP (Southwest Power Pool) — Northeast Texas
Utilities
Bowie-Cass Electric Cooperative [TBV]
State Permitting Process
No state siting board for solar in Texas. PUCT regulates utilities; ERCOT manages interconnection for ERCOT service territory (most of state); SPP governs Panhandle/northwest TX. County Commissioners Court governs unincorporated areas under Texas Local Government Code. Many rural TX counties have NO zoning authority — solar is essentially by-right without county approval requirement. HB 2527 (2023) requires counties with solar ordinances to provide a 'reasonable' permitting framework. No statewide preemption prevents county restrictions. ERCOT interconnection queue is severely congested — grid study delays of 2-4+ years common.
State Incentives
Texas has no state RPS mandate. Key incentives: Federal ITC (30% base + bonus adders for energy communities/domestic content). Property tax abatement via Chapter 312/313 successor frameworks (county-level negotiation required). ERCOT wholesale market provides strong merchant revenue stack. No state income tax benefits developer HQ decisions. USDA REAP available for rural projects.

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
Samson Solar Energy Center — multi-county project; phases affecting Franklin County proceeding [TBV — Franklin County-specific MW allocation].
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
None formally denied via county action; moratorium attempt (Nov 2022) was the primary hostile action, since overruled.

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker

Last verified: April 2026 (web research) | SolarRisk Tracker | Data sources: Government records, utility filings, public meeting minutes