SolarRisk Tracker / Explore / TX / Aransas

Aransas County, TX — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

45.5
Risk Grade
Good
No ordinance, no moratorium. Very small land area (252 sq mi) and coastal character substantially limit utility-scale solar opportunity.
Assessment Snapshot
Population
23830
State Rank
#32
Compliance
35%
Trajectory
50

Moratorium Status

✓ No Active Moratorium
No specific moratorium information available.

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
None codified.
Zoning Mechanism
No ordinance — by-right in unincorporated areas.
Acreage Caps
None.
Density Caps
None.
Spacing Rules
None.
Size Restrictions
None.

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Neutral — no documented solar board votes; limited solar development opportunity.
Basis for Assessment
Small coastal county; tourism/retirement community character; R-majority board; limited utility-scale solar land availability.
Political Risk Factors
Stable
Board Members
Commissioners Court | 4 Commissioners + County Judge | Rockport, Texas | 4-yr partisan terms | County Judge: Ray A. Garza | Jack Chaney (P1), Leslie Casterline (P2), Pat Rousseau (P3), Wendy Laubach (P4)

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
ERCOT
Utilities
AEP Texas Central
State Permitting Process
No state siting board for solar in Texas. PUCT regulates utilities; ERCOT manages interconnection for ERCOT service territory (most of state); SPP governs Panhandle/northwest TX. County Commissioners Court governs unincorporated areas under Texas Local Government Code. Many rural TX counties have NO zoning authority — solar is essentially by-right without county approval requirement. HB 2527 (2023) requires counties with solar ordinances to provide a 'reasonable' permitting framework. No statewide preemption prevents county restrictions. ERCOT interconnection queue is severely congested — grid study delays of 2-4+ years common.
State Incentives
Texas has no state RPS mandate. Key incentives: Federal ITC (30% base + bonus adders for energy communities/domestic content). Property tax abatement via Chapter 312/313 successor frameworks (county-level negotiation required). ERCOT wholesale market provides strong merchant revenue stack. No state income tax benefits developer HQ decisions. USDA REAP available for rural projects.

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
No confirmed utility-scale solar projects — county too small and coastal for large-format solar.
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
None documented.

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker

Last verified: 2026-04-01 | SolarRisk Tracker | Data sources: Government records, utility filings, public meeting minutes