Williamson County, TN — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

72.9
Risk Grade
Fail
County Executive: Rogers Anderson | R | 2026; Commission: Republican supermajority; anti-solar majority documented in 2022-2024 vote record; chair: Gregg Lawrence | R
Assessment Snapshot
Population
247726
State Rank
#55
Compliance
70%
Trajectory
65

Moratorium Status

✓ No Active Moratorium
No specific moratorium information available.

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
Setback standards being formally codified 2025; 1,000 ft from residential structures proposed; screening requirements stringent
Zoning Mechanism
CUP per SB 2373; decommissioning bond required; stringent setback and screening requirements being adopted; MTE coordination; visual impact studies required
Acreage Caps
Acreage caps under active discussion; commissioner proposals to limit project size
Spacing Rules
Under discussion — county may adopt explicit size limit
Size Restrictions
5

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Brentwood/Franklin HOA coalitions; county commission very responsive to wealthy anti-solar constituents; multiple organized opposition campaigns documented 2022–2024
Basis for Assessment
Brentwood/Franklin; wealthiest TN county; TN's fastest-growing affluent suburb; extremely strong HOA and community opposition to utility-scale solar; shrinking agricultural land rapidly; commission highly responsive to anti-solar constituents; essentially hostile environment for new utility-scale projects
Political Risk Factors
Rapidly Worsening
Board Members
2026-04-02

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
Federal ITC eligible; no Tennessee state solar tax credit; TVA Green Power Switch program
Utilities
Tennessee Valley Authority (wholesale), williamsoncounty-tn.gov/commission
State Permitting Process
Middle Tennessee Electric (MTE)
State Incentives
County zoning authority under SB 2373 (2022); conditional use permit or special exception required; decommissioning bond often required; setback standards increasingly codified at county level

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
Three applications denied 2022–2024; two withdrawn under community pressure 2024; one sued county (settled)
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
Strongly opposed — organized and effective

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker