Richland County, OH — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

83
Risk Grade
Fail
SB 52 exclusion zone — county commissioners have banned utility-scale solar in all or most unincorporated areas. NC Ohio; Mansfield area; Richland County confirmed SB 52 exclusion zone (2025); voters challenging ban on May 2026 ballot (4,300+ signatures collected); landmark community pushback case
Assessment Snapshot
Population
120,962
State Rank
#26
Compliance
85%
Trajectory
82

Moratorium Status

⚠ Active Moratorium
Active SB 52 Exclusion Zone — county resolution banning utility-scale solar

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
OPSB standard applies per OAC 4906-4-09(G)(4): ≥50 ft from parcel boundary; ≥300 ft from non-participating residences; ≥150 ft from road ROW. No additional county-specific setbacks.
Zoning Mechanism
Richland County: sub-50 MW projects governed by county zoning ordinance. ≥50 MW requires OPSB CECPN (see State Permitting Requirements).
Acreage Caps
None codified.
Density Caps
Richland County: exclusion zone active — functional cap of ZERO new utility-scale solar.
Spacing Rules
None codified.
Size Restrictions
None codified.

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Contested — SB52 ban passed July 2025; 3,380 voter signatures forced May 2026 ballot referendum
Basis for Assessment
Richland Co. SB52 ban July 2025 challenged by referendum; May 2026 voters decide; outcome could shape statewide SB52 use
Political Risk Factors
Worsening
Board Members
Darrell Banks | R | Commissioner | Cliff Mears | R | Commissioner | Tony Vero | R | Commissioner | Board of County Commissioners | 3 members | Mansfield, Ohio | 4-yr staggered terms | Partisan elections | All-Republican board

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
PJM / FirstEnergy (ATSI — Ohio Edison / Toledo Edison) zone
Utilities
First Energy (Ohio Edison), First Energy (Ohio Edison)
State Permitting Process
Ohio Power Siting Board (OPSB) has jurisdiction for solar ≥50 MW (Ohio Revised Code Chapter 4906). Senate Bill 52 (2021) dramatically altered the siting process: county commissioners gained authority to (1) block individual projects via 90-day review window (must adopt resolution within 90 days of public meeting), and (2) pass blanket 'exclusion zones' restricting all utility-scale solar/wind in unincorporated areas. As of September 2025, 37 Ohio counties have enacted SB 52 exclusion zones affecting at least 1 township. Known full/near-full county bans (as of Mar 2026): Adams, Allen, Auglaize, Brown, Butler, Clark, Clermont, Columbiana, Crawford, Erie, Fairfield, Fayette, Greene, Hancock, Henry, Licking, Logan, Madison, Mahoning, Marion, Medina, Morrow, Ottawa, Putnam, Richland, Seneca, Union, Wayne. Kingwood Solar (175 MW, Greene County) OPSB denial on 'public interest' grounds is before Ohio Supreme Court (oral arguments Mar 13, 2025; decision pending Mar 2026). Projects <50 MW: local zoning governs (HB 501 of 2023 granted local authority over sub-50 MW projects). OPSB certificate preempts local zoning once issued (RC 4906.13(B)); but SB 52 allows county veto before OPSB stage. Priority Investment Areas (PIA): brownfield/former coal mine sites may receive expedited 90-day OPSB review. PJM interconnection required. Most of Ohio served by AEP Ohio, FirstEnergy (ATSI), Duke Energy Ohio (DEOK), or AES Ohio/DP&L.
State Incentives
Ohio has no Renewable Portfolio Standard (HB 6 2019 effectively eliminated compliance mandate). SREC market: Ohio SRECs tradeable but very low value due to lack of mandate (~$2-5/SREC 2024). Net metering: available under Ohio law for ≤120% of customer load; AEP Ohio, FirstEnergy (Ohio Edison, CEI, Toledo Edison), Duke/DP&L, AES Ohio offer standard programs. Solar PILOT (Payment in Lieu of Taxes): county agreements common for large-scale projects. Ohio Enterprise Zone/CRA: potential tax abatement for qualifying sites. SB52 (2021): county commissioners can restrict ≥50 MW solar projects via exclusion zones or individual project veto — key risk factor for development in 37+ Ohio counties.

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
No confirmed utility-scale solar projects on public record as of Mar 2026.
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
11 of 18 townships adopted solar exclusion zones Jul 2025 (Monroe, Blooming Grove, Jackson, Franklin, Mifflin, Jefferson, Sharon, Troy, Plymouth, Weller). County-wide ballot measure scheduled May 2026 to determine legality of industrial solar. Source: now.solar/2026/03/20 (News 5 Cleveland WEWS)

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker