Greene County, OH — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

89.2
Risk Grade
Fail
SB 52 exclusion zone — county commissioners have banned utility-scale solar in all or most unincorporated areas. SW Ohio; Dayton E suburb (Fairborn/Xenia); Wright-Patterson AFB; Greene County confirmed SB 52 exclusion zone; Kingwood Solar (175 MW) landmark OPSB denial case — Ohio Supreme Court pending
Assessment Snapshot
Population
167,966
State Rank
#35
Compliance
85%
Trajectory
82

Moratorium Status

⚠ Active Moratorium
Active SB 52 Exclusion Zone — county resolution banning utility-scale solar

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
OPSB standard applies per OAC 4906-4-09(G)(4): ≥50 ft from parcel boundary; ≥300 ft from non-participating residences; ≥150 ft from road ROW. No additional county-specific setbacks.
Zoning Mechanism
Greene County: sub-50 MW projects governed by county zoning ordinance. ≥50 MW requires OPSB CECPN (see State Permitting Requirements).
Acreage Caps
None codified.
Density Caps
Greene County: exclusion zone active — functional cap of ZERO new utility-scale solar.
Spacing Rules
None codified.
Size Restrictions
None codified.

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Hostile — Kingwood Solar denial driven by Greene County commissioners; one of 3 precedent-setting 'public interest' denials
Basis for Assessment
Kingwood Solar OH Supreme Court case (decision pending 2025) will define 'public interest' standard for all future Ohio solar; SB52 ban in place
Political Risk Factors
Worsening
Board Members
Mike Haseley | R | Commissioner | Tom Koogler | R | Commissioner | Dick Gould | R | Commissioner | All-R board; county commissioners and three townships actively opposed Kingwood Solar (Vesper Energy) — key factor in OPSB Dec 2022 denial. Verify current members at greenecountyohio.gov

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
PJM / AES Ohio / Dayton Power & Light (AEP zone / DP&L) zone
Utilities
AES Ohio (DP&L), AES Ohio (DP&L)
State Permitting Process
Ohio Power Siting Board (OPSB) has jurisdiction for solar ≥50 MW (Ohio Revised Code Chapter 4906). Senate Bill 52 (2021) dramatically altered the siting process: county commissioners gained authority to (1) block individual projects via 90-day review window (must adopt resolution within 90 days of public meeting), and (2) pass blanket 'exclusion zones' restricting all utility-scale solar/wind in unincorporated areas. As of September 2025, 37 Ohio counties have enacted SB 52 exclusion zones affecting at least 1 township. Known full/near-full county bans (as of Mar 2026): Adams, Allen, Auglaize, Brown, Butler, Clark, Clermont, Columbiana, Crawford, Erie, Fairfield, Fayette, Greene, Hancock, Henry, Licking, Logan, Madison, Mahoning, Marion, Medina, Morrow, Ottawa, Putnam, Richland, Seneca, Union, Wayne. Kingwood Solar (175 MW, Greene County) OPSB denial on 'public interest' grounds is before Ohio Supreme Court (oral arguments Mar 13, 2025; decision pending Mar 2026). Projects <50 MW: local zoning governs (HB 501 of 2023 granted local authority over sub-50 MW projects). OPSB certificate preempts local zoning once issued (RC 4906.13(B)); but SB 52 allows county veto before OPSB stage. Priority Investment Areas (PIA): brownfield/former coal mine sites may receive expedited 90-day OPSB review. PJM interconnection required. Most of Ohio served by AEP Ohio, FirstEnergy (ATSI), Duke Energy Ohio (DEOK), or AES Ohio/DP&L.
State Incentives
Ohio has no Renewable Portfolio Standard (HB 6 2019 effectively eliminated compliance mandate). SREC market: Ohio SRECs tradeable but very low value due to lack of mandate (~$2-5/SREC 2024). Net metering: available under Ohio law for ≤120% of customer load; AEP Ohio, FirstEnergy (Ohio Edison, CEI, Toledo Edison), Duke/DP&L, AES Ohio offer standard programs. Solar PILOT (Payment in Lieu of Taxes): county agreements common for large-scale projects. Ohio Enterprise Zone/CRA: potential tax abatement for qualifying sites. SB52 (2021): county commissioners can restrict ≥50 MW solar projects via exclusion zones or individual project veto — key risk factor for development in 37+ Ohio counties.

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
SW Ohio; Xenia/Beavercreek area; suburban Dayton; AEP Ohio/Dayton Power & Light. Kingwood Solar | 175 MW | Greene County | DENIED by OPSB December 2022. This is now before the Ohio Supreme Court (oral arguments March 13 2025 — decision pending as of Mar 2026). Core question: whether OPSB can rely on local government opposition as a de facto veto. No utility-scale solar operational in Greene County as of Mar 2026.
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
Kingwood Solar 175 MW — OPSB DENIED December 2022. Ohio Supreme Court case pending (oral args Mar 13 2025): Kingwood argues OPSB departure from 44 previous approvals where local opposition was never deemed controlling. SB52 exclusion zone enacted for Greene County (OPSB map Feb 19 2026).

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker