Shoshone County, ID — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

51.8
Risk Grade
Fair
Former mining county with no solar framework; declining population; forested terrain limits utility-scale; mining legacy zoning adds complexity; conservative anti-change politics
Assessment Snapshot
Population
13000
State Rank
#17
Compliance
40%
Trajectory
45

Moratorium Status

✓ No Active Moratorium
No

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
General setback requirements for rural/mining district structures
Zoning Mechanism
Conditional Use or variance via Board of County Commissioners; limited solar permitting experience; mining legacy zoning may conflict
Acreage Caps
None established
Density Caps
None established
Spacing Rules
Not specified
Size Restrictions
General height limits

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Skeptical to neutral — former mining community focused on economic revival through recreation/tourism; limited solar advocacy; some anti-development sentiment
Basis for Assessment
Silver Valley mining legacy (Bunker Hill Superfund site area); economically stressed community; conservative rural values; limited renewable energy awareness
Political Risk Factors
Declining
Board Members
David Dose (Chair); Jeff Zimmermann; Mike Fitzgerald

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
Avista Utilities / WECC-NWPP
Utilities
Avista Utilities, Shoshone County Electric Cooperative (portions)
State Permitting Process
County CUP/variance process; state building code; EPA coordination for Bunker Hill vicinity
State Incentives
Eligible — Idaho Residential Clean Energy Credit; Avista net metering

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
None on record
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
0

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker