Oneida County, ID — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

39.5
Risk Grade
Good
Small conservative LDS county with no solar framework; low development pressure; Utah proximity provides limited influence; uncertain approval pathway
Assessment Snapshot
Population
4600
State Rank
#9
Compliance
35%
Trajectory
40

Moratorium Status

✓ No Active Moratorium
No

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
General setback requirements for rural structures
Zoning Mechanism
Conditional Use or variance via Board of County Commissioners; very limited solar permitting history
Acreage Caps
None established
Density Caps
None established
Spacing Rules
Not specified
Size Restrictions
General height limits

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Neutral to skeptical — very conservative LDS community; Utah border brings some solar awareness; small agricultural community resistant to land use changes
Basis for Assessment
Strong LDS values; Malad City rural community; agricultural land stewardship concern; limited exposure to utility-scale solar development
Political Risk Factors
Stable
Board Members
Brian Whitworth (Chair); Wade Hawkes; Nathan Whitworth

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
Rocky Mountain Power (PacifiCorp East) / WECC-RMPP
Utilities
Rocky Mountain Power (PacifiCorp East), None significant
State Permitting Process
County CUP/variance process; state building code
State Incentives
Eligible — Idaho Residential Clean Energy Credit; Rocky Mountain Power net metering

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
None verified
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
0

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker