Fremont County, ID — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

38.8
Risk Grade
Good
Conservative agricultural county with no solar-specific framework; some utility-scale interest due to flat terrain in western portions; proximity to Teton progressive enclave adds mild influence
Assessment Snapshot
Population
13700
State Rank
#8
Compliance
30%
Trajectory
35

Moratorium Status

✓ No Active Moratorium
No

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
General setback requirements for rural structures
Zoning Mechanism
Conditional Use or variance via Board of County Commissioners; limited solar permitting history
Acreage Caps
None established
Density Caps
None established
Spacing Rules
Not specified
Size Restrictions
General height limits

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Neutral — conservative agricultural community; some solar lease interest among farmers; proximity to Teton County adds progressive influence at margins
Basis for Assessment
Conservative LDS-influenced community; eastern Idaho agricultural economy; some solar lease interest; Teton County proximity adds minor progressive influence
Political Risk Factors
Stable
Board Members
Gary Rammell (Chair); Jonathan Berry; Jeff Heaton

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
Rocky Mountain Power (PacifiCorp East) / Fall River Rural Electric Cooperative / WECC-RMPP
Utilities
Rocky Mountain Power (PacifiCorp East), Fall River Rural Electric Cooperative
State Permitting Process
County CUP/variance process; state building code
State Incentives
Eligible — Idaho Residential Clean Energy Credit; Rocky Mountain Power net metering

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
None verified
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
0

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker