Franklin County, ID — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

38
Risk Grade
Good
Very conservative agricultural county with Utah border proximity; no dedicated solar framework; LDS community land stewardship values limit large-scale conversion
Assessment Snapshot
Population
14500
State Rank
#7
Compliance
35%
Trajectory
40

Moratorium Status

✓ No Active Moratorium
No

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
General setback requirements for structures
Zoning Mechanism
Conditional Use or variance via Board of County Commissioners; limited institutional solar experience
Acreage Caps
None established
Density Caps
None established
Spacing Rules
Not specified
Size Restrictions
General height limits

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Neutral to slightly skeptical — very conservative LDS community; some Utah solar influence across border; agricultural land preservation concern
Basis for Assessment
Strong LDS conservative values; Utah border influence brings some solar awareness; agricultural economy resistant to land use change
Political Risk Factors
Stable
Board Members
Scott Hancock (Chair); James Henderson; Jay Andrus

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
Rocky Mountain Power (PacifiCorp East) / WECC-RMPP
Utilities
Rocky Mountain Power (PacifiCorp East), None significant
State Permitting Process
County CUP/variance process; state building code
State Incentives
Eligible — Idaho Residential Clean Energy Credit; Rocky Mountain Power net metering

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
None verified
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
0

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker