Boundary County, ID — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

54.8
Risk Grade
Fair
Northernmost Idaho county with strong anti-establishment politics; potential for politically-motivated permit denial; very low development pressure but very high uncertainty
Assessment Snapshot
Population
13400
State Rank
#19
Compliance
50%
Trajectory
55

Moratorium Status

✓ No Active Moratorium
No

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
General setback requirements; county may impose additional conditions based on political climate
Zoning Mechanism
Conditional Use Permit required; potential for commission denial on political rather than technical grounds
Acreage Caps
None established; potential for restrictive caps if ordinance developed
Density Caps
None established
Spacing Rules
Not specified
Size Restrictions
General height limits

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Skeptical to opposed — strong anti-government/anti-corporate land use sentiment; Liberty movement and Three Percenters influence
Basis for Assessment
Known Liberty movement/constitutional county advocacy; local opposition to federal land management; northern panhandle conservative stronghold
Political Risk Factors
Declining
Board Members
Wally Cossairt (Chair); Dan Dinning; Tim Bertling

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
Avista Utilities / WECC-NWPP
Utilities
Avista Utilities, Northern Lights Inc. (electric cooperative)
State Permitting Process
County CUP process; state building code; potential additional local requirements
State Incentives
Eligible — Idaho Residential Clean Energy Credit; Avista net metering

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
None verified
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
0

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker