Putnam County, FL — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

38
Risk Grade
Good
Rural north FL county in FPL territory; no solar ordinance or moratorium; stable trajectory; standard CUP process; large agricultural/timberland parcels available; primary constraint is limited developer pipeline activity; St. Johns River buffer zone may limit some parcels; USDA REAP rural eligible
Assessment Snapshot
Population
73441
State Rank
#12
Compliance
35%
Trajectory
50

Moratorium Status

✓ No Active Moratorium
No specific moratorium information available.

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
No solar-specific setbacks; agricultural zone setbacks apply by default; St. Johns River buffer requirements may apply near water bodies
Zoning Mechanism
CUP required in agricultural and rural zones; county commission review; no dedicated solar pre-application process; limited county planning staff capacity
Acreage Caps
None established
Density Caps
None established
Spacing Rules
None established
Size Restrictions
No county cap; FPSA applies for facilities >75 MW (FL DEP siting jurisdiction)

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Neutral
Basis for Assessment
Putnam County is a rural north FL county with an agricultural and timber economy; no organized solar opposition; commissioners have not publicly addressed utility-scale solar policy; FPL serves the county but pipeline activity has been limited; large agricultural and timberland parcels along Hwy 17 and CR 20 corridors have solar development potential
Political Risk Factors
Stable
Board Members
Commissioner JR Newbold (D1), Commissioner Leota Wilkinson (D2), Commissioner Josh Alexander (D3), Commissioner Larry Harvey

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
SERC / Florida Reliability Coordinating Council (FRCC) | FPL (NextEra Energy) transmission zone
Utilities
Florida Power & Light (FPL / NextEra Energy), Clay Electric Cooperative (rural distribution — portions of Putnam County)
State Permitting Process
Florida Power Siting Act (FPSA) — Florida DEP has siting jurisdiction for facilities >75 MW. Below 75 MW, county land use authority governs via CUP/SUP process. Florida Statute §163.3205 (2024) limits county restrictions on solar in agricultural zones — cannot prohibit as a matter of law. No state-level preemption below 75 MW threshold. FPL (NextEra Energy) dominates utility-scale procurement in southern and eastern FL; Duke Energy Florida serves central west coast; Tampa Electric (TECO) serves Hillsborough/Polk corridor; Florida Power & Light interconnects through FPL transmission. County commission approves CUPs for projects <75 MW in unincorporated areas.
State Incentives
Florida has no state RPS (Renewable Portfolio Standard) — only a voluntary goal (100% clean energy by 2050). Key incentives: Federal ITC (30% base + energy community/domestic content adders). Florida Statute §163.3205 (2024) limits local government ability to restrict solar on agricultural land — counties cannot ban solar outright on ag-zoned land. Net metering available. Property tax exemption for residential solar (FL Const. Art. VII §3). No state income tax. USDA REAP for rural projects. FPL, Duke Energy Florida, and Tampa Electric IRP programs include significant utility-scale solar procurement.

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
Very limited confirmed utility-scale projects; FPL has evaluated Putnam County sites for future procurement; St. Johns River management area may impose some siting constraints; [TBV FL DEP FPSA registry]
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
None on record

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker