Lee County, FL — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

32
Risk Grade
Excellent
Large southwest FL county in FPL territory; active solar market with post-Hurricane Ian resilience driver; permissive CUP process; improving trajectory; no moratorium; agricultural land available in eastern portions; FPL IRP pipeline; USDA REAP eligible for rural eastern Lee
Assessment Snapshot
Population
761581
State Rank
#5
Compliance
35%
Trajectory
20

Moratorium Status

✓ No Active Moratorium
No specific moratorium information available.

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
Agricultural zone setbacks only; no solar-specific setback standards beyond standard property line requirements; CUP conditions may include landscaping buffers near residential zones
Zoning Mechanism
CUP in agricultural/rural zones; county commission review; post-Ian resilience framing has made commissioners more receptive to solar CUP applications
Acreage Caps
None established
Density Caps
None established
Spacing Rules
None established
Size Restrictions
No county cap; FPSA applies for facilities >75 MW (FL DEP siting jurisdiction)

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Supportive
Basis for Assessment
Lee County commissioners have publicly supported solar as part of post-Hurricane Ian resilience strategy; FPL has active presence; agricultural landowners in eastern Lee County (Alva, Buckingham areas) have explored solar lease opportunities; no organized opposition
Political Risk Factors
Improving
Board Members
Commissioner Kevin Ruane (D1), Commissioner Cecil Pendergrass (D2/Chair), Commissioner David Mulicka (D3/VC), Commissioner Brian Hamman (D4), Commissioner Trish Petrosky (D5)

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
SERC / Florida Reliability Coordinating Council (FRCC) | FPL (NextEra Energy) transmission zone
Utilities
Florida Power & Light (FPL / NextEra Energy), Lee County Electric Cooperative (LCEC — rural distribution portions of eastern Lee)
State Permitting Process
Florida Power Siting Act (FPSA) — Florida DEP has siting jurisdiction for facilities >75 MW. Below 75 MW, county land use authority governs via CUP/SUP process. Florida Statute §163.3205 (2024) limits county restrictions on solar in agricultural zones — cannot prohibit as a matter of law. No state-level preemption below 75 MW threshold. FPL (NextEra Energy) dominates utility-scale procurement in southern and eastern FL; Duke Energy Florida serves central west coast; Tampa Electric (TECO) serves Hillsborough/Polk corridor; Florida Power & Light interconnects through FPL transmission. County commission approves CUPs for projects <75 MW in unincorporated areas.
State Incentives
Florida has no state RPS (Renewable Portfolio Standard) — only a voluntary goal (100% clean energy by 2050). Key incentives: Federal ITC (30% base + energy community/domestic content adders). Florida Statute §163.3205 (2024) limits local government ability to restrict solar on agricultural land — counties cannot ban solar outright on ag-zoned land. Net metering available. Property tax exemption for residential solar (FL Const. Art. VII §3). No state income tax. USDA REAP for rural projects. FPL, Duke Energy Florida, and Tampa Electric IRP programs include significant utility-scale solar procurement.

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
FPL has operational and pipeline solar projects in Lee County unincorporated areas; Babcock Ranch (adjacent to Charlotte County) is connected to Lee market; post-Ian distributed solar has increased; [TBV specific utility-scale project names from FL DEP FPSA registry]
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
None on record

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker