Glades County, FL — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

46.2
Risk Grade
Good
Rural agricultural county in Lake Okeechobee basin; FPL territory; large land base with favorable solar profile; no solar ordinance; limited pipeline so far but favorable conditions for FPL expansion from DeSoto/Hendry corridor; stable trajectory
Assessment Snapshot
Population
13802
State Rank
#18
Compliance
35%
Trajectory
50

Moratorium Status

✓ No Active Moratorium
No specific moratorium information available.

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
Standard zoning setbacks apply | No county-specific solar setbacks established
Zoning Mechanism
CUP (Conditional Use Permit) in agricultural/rural zones; by-right for rooftop/small commercial
Acreage Caps
None established
Density Caps
None established
Spacing Rules
None established
Size Restrictions
No county cap; FPSA applies for facilities >75 MW (FL DEP siting jurisdiction)

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Neutral
Basis for Assessment
Rural Lake Okeechobee basin county; FPL territory; large agricultural land base with good solar profile; no solar ordinance; stable passive posture; proximity to Hendry/DeSoto corridor makes it a near-term pipeline candidate
Political Risk Factors
Stable
Board Members
Commissioner Jeffrey Patterson (D1), Commissioner Jefferson Barnes (D2), Commissioner Jerry Sapp (D3), Commissioner Hattie Taylor (D4), Commissioner Tim Stanley (D5/Chair)

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
SERC / Florida Reliability Coordinating Council (FRCC) | FPL (NextEra Energy) transmission zone
Utilities
Florida Power & Light (FPL / NextEra Energy), Glades Electric Cooperative
State Permitting Process
Florida Power Siting Act (FPSA) — Florida DEP has siting jurisdiction for facilities >75 MW. Below 75 MW, county land use authority governs via CUP/SUP process. Florida Statute §163.3205 (2024) limits county restrictions on solar in agricultural zones — cannot prohibit as a matter of law. No state-level preemption below 75 MW threshold. FPL (NextEra Energy) dominates utility-scale procurement in southern and eastern FL; Duke Energy Florida serves central west coast; Tampa Electric (TECO) serves Hillsborough/Polk corridor; Florida Power & Light interconnects through FPL transmission. County commission approves CUPs for projects <75 MW in unincorporated areas.
State Incentives
Florida has no state RPS (Renewable Portfolio Standard) — only a voluntary goal (100% clean energy by 2050). Key incentives: Federal ITC (30% base + energy community/domestic content adders). Florida Statute §163.3205 (2024) limits local government ability to restrict solar on agricultural land — counties cannot ban solar outright on ag-zoned land. Net metering available. Property tax exemption for residential solar (FL Const. Art. VII §3). No state income tax. USDA REAP for rural projects. FPL, Duke Energy Florida, and Tampa Electric IRP programs include significant utility-scale solar procurement.

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
FPL Lake Okeechobee area solar projects (proximity); [TBV utility-scale CUP filings in Glades County — favorable agricultural land profile]
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
None on record

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker