Flagler County, FL — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

32
Risk Grade
Excellent
Fast-growing coastal county (fastest in FL 2020–2023); FPL territory; low compliance burden via general CUP; improving trajectory as growth attracts solar development interest; low current saturation = good opportunity window
Assessment Snapshot
Population
115081
State Rank
#5
Compliance
35%
Trajectory
20

Moratorium Status

✓ No Active Moratorium
No specific moratorium information available.

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
Standard zoning setbacks apply | No county-specific solar setbacks established
Zoning Mechanism
CUP (Conditional Use Permit) in agricultural/rural zones; by-right for rooftop/small commercial
Acreage Caps
None established
Density Caps
None established
Spacing Rules
None established
Size Restrictions
No county cap; FPSA applies for facilities >75 MW (FL DEP siting jurisdiction)

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Neutral–Supportive
Basis for Assessment
Florida's fastest-growing county in early 2020s; economic development orientation supports solar; FPL territory; low compliance burden; improving trajectory as growth attracts energy development interest; no organized opposition
Political Risk Factors
Improving
Board Members
Commissioner Pam Richardson, Commissioner Kim Carney (D3/VC), Commissioner Leann Pennington (D4/Chair), Commissioner Andy Dance, Commissioner Greg Hansen

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
SERC / Florida Reliability Coordinating Council (FRCC) | FPL (NextEra Energy) transmission zone
Utilities
Florida Power & Light (FPL / NextEra Energy), Suwannee Valley Electric Cooperative (partial western edge)
State Permitting Process
Florida Power Siting Act (FPSA) — Florida DEP has siting jurisdiction for facilities >75 MW. Below 75 MW, county land use authority governs via CUP/SUP process. Florida Statute §163.3205 (2024) limits county restrictions on solar in agricultural zones — cannot prohibit as a matter of law. No state-level preemption below 75 MW threshold. FPL (NextEra Energy) dominates utility-scale procurement in southern and eastern FL; Duke Energy Florida serves central west coast; Tampa Electric (TECO) serves Hillsborough/Polk corridor; Florida Power & Light interconnects through FPL transmission. County commission approves CUPs for projects <75 MW in unincorporated areas.
State Incentives
Florida has no state RPS (Renewable Portfolio Standard) — only a voluntary goal (100% clean energy by 2050). Key incentives: Federal ITC (30% base + energy community/domestic content adders). Florida Statute §163.3205 (2024) limits local government ability to restrict solar on agricultural land — counties cannot ban solar outright on ag-zoned land. Net metering available. Property tax exemption for residential solar (FL Const. Art. VII §3). No state income tax. USDA REAP for rural projects. FPL, Duke Energy Florida, and Tampa Electric IRP programs include significant utility-scale solar procurement.

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
FPL distributed and C&I solar in Palm Coast area; [TBV utility-scale CUP filings — growing development pressure may spur pipeline]
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
None on record

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker