Yolo County, CA — Solar Development Risk Assessment

Local solar ordinance barriers, board sentiment, and utility policies that affect development timelines and risk.

43.1
Risk Grade
Good
Flat Sacramento Valley county with progressive governance influenced by UC Davis; Williamson Act constrains prime agricultural land but agrivoltaic dual-use research creates innovative potential pathway; PG&E territory with good interconnection capacity; growing solar farm activity on non-prime land; UC Davis agrivoltaic program could pioneer approval pathway for dual-use solar; solid emerging secondary market
Assessment Snapshot
Population
222000
State Rank
#11
Compliance
40%
Trajectory
33

Moratorium Status

✓ No Active Moratorium
No specific moratorium information available.

Ordinance & Regulations

Setback Requirements
50 ft from property lines; additional setbacks from residences; agrivoltaic projects may have modified setback standards
Zoning Mechanism
CUP via Yolo County Planning Commission; Board of Supervisors final; CEQA standard review; agrivoltaic projects may qualify for modified permitting under pilot programs
Acreage Caps
None formal
Spacing Rules
Not specified; case-by-case
Size Restrictions
Williamson Act prime farmland constrained; agrivoltaic dual-use concept could open new land classes with appropriate county policy development

Board Sentiment & Political Risk

Sentiment Analysis
Favorable; progressive county with UC Davis clean energy influence; BOS supportive of solar on non-prime land; agrivoltaic research community supportive of innovation; agricultural interests generally receptive to dual-use approaches
Basis for Assessment
Yolo County Planning Commission records; UC Davis agrivoltaic research program publications; CA Energy Commission; Williamson Act records; PG&E interconnection queue
Political Risk Factors
Progressive (UC Davis influence); solar-supportive county; agrivoltaic research creates innovative development pathway; BOS generally receptive
Board Members
Jim Provenza | D | 2026; Don Saylor | D | 2028; Gary Sandy | R | 2026; Lucas Frerichs | D | 2028; Angel Barajas | D | 2026

Grid, Utilities & State Context

Grid Operator
CAISO — PG&E Balancing Authority
Utilities
Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E)
State Permitting Process
County zoning + CEQA review required; CEC siting jurisdiction for projects >50 MW on state/federal land; Coastal Commission review for coastal zone; DRECP DFAs streamline desert county permitting
State Incentives
Federal ITC eligible; California Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP) for storage; CA Renewables Portfolio Standard procurement; CPUC approved procurement programs

Development Activity

Active/Completed Projects
7
Denied/Withdrawn Projects
1

Explore the Full Tracker

View risk assessments for all 3,100+ US counties, compare states, and download detailed ordinance data for your solar development pipeline.

Launch SolarRisk Tracker